- Forum
-
Ideas
Is this a high risk system?
This is a stupid high risk system! You have only tested this system for 11 weeks, a new system would require at least 12 months for it to be deemed successful. I cannot believe you're selling this for £99, 1 freak day could lose your whole bank.
Answer
Hey Adam, I have been working and testing this particular system for the past 2 years. The 11 weeks test were just referring to testing of the Beta version of ARE. Hence why the £99 price tag.
Everyone says they've tested for years and the results are consistent, yet every system fails so where's the 2 years proof? I can't see any mathematic skill involved in this system. It's high risk betting putting a lot in to receive a little, just doesn't quite fill me with confidence. If you can give me 2 years worth of proof I won't request a refund.
To be honest Adam, alot of people who claim to have "2 year proof" just make it up. It's easy to get someone to just make write them up on some spreadsheet and release them as "official" results. Hence why I've decided to track my results "live" on this Google Sheet (Click Here) as I now have real, public members that can back them up. Not many tipsters are willing to do that.
The way we eliminate risk is by:
1) Spending time on finding the best selections to have the highest strike rate possible (around 99.2%)
2) Spreading risk across a number of series of accumulated bets. One succesful Hare or Tortoise series can make you up to 50 times your starting bank meaning that if you start with £100 you can end up withdrawing £5,000.
You do have a 60 day period to track results yourself and you feel like this is not for you, please send me a Private Message and I'll arrange the refund.
I would like to pitch in here and respond to Adam. He calls the system stupid and I fully understand where he is coming from as not long ago I would have responded in exactly the same way if someone had told me that there was serious money to be made by wagering non-trivial amounts in order to make piffling gains. So, I fully empathise Adam with why you feel the way you do! On the face of it it seems like an insane way to bet. However, I want you to reflect soberly upon the following facts; the denizens of the financial mile in the City of London consider that they have had a good day if at the end of it their overall portfolio value has increased by just a piddling 3%. Because of the miracle of compounding interest if an investment account is increasing in value at just that rate it takes less than a month to double your start-up bank! Were you aware of this? If you don't believe me then do the maths yourself and you will find that you can actually double your account balance in less than a month. It sounds hard to believe but if you do the arithmetic you'll find that I speak sooth.
(Einstein called Compounding Interest the 8th natural marvel of the world.)
Now let me diverge a little bit to tell you a story. Several months ago I started using a horse racing system that was touted as having a strike rate very comparable to that of AutoRiskEliminator. I put in my due diligence and researched as much as I could before parting with my money and the testimonials were enthusiastic and quite supportive of the system so I bought it. They recommended putting 15% of your total available bank on each bet. In just three weeks I parlayed my start-up Betfair bank of about £200 into twenty pounds short of £400 - which was my initial target. 3 weeks! I was quietly ecstatic!
Then,
I had a loser. And within a week I had another three losers which dropped me all the way back to virtually what I had started with. To say I was disappointed is an understatement of magnitude - I was really crushed. I was so close to realising a long-standing dream of mine to find some way to reliably parlay x amount of money into 2x and then 4x and so on. And then to see your dream stamped on - man it hurts. Needless to say I stopped using that particular system pronto.
To this day I don't really understand why a system that had performed so well for three whole weeks just suddenly went bad on me. Statistics and probabilities I suppose but I'm no mathematician so can't say for sure. Horse racing is a game
with a hell of a lot of variables to be factored into it so maybe Sod's Law just came up!
Anyway to get back to the main gist. It seems to me that football offers far fewer variables than the gee-gee game does so
maybe 1x really can be parlayed into 2x, 4x, 8x etc.! Time - and practice of the system - will tell.
Be aware that money aggregates so fast with a compounding interest system that you can take an occasional loser in your
stride but runs of losers really do dent you. Also be aware that while you are aggregating that your daily 'interest' gain in
your account is analogous to the City of London traders having a good day! Worth thinking about! Also remember that odds of 1.01 to 1.1 are typical of what bookies offer when you're trying to bet on Roger or Rafa winning a tennis match. That's when they're opposed by a rank and file player who they're definitely expected to beat quite easily; you only get decent odds with these players when they're playing someone else in the top twenty. So, decent odds = good chance of losing your bet, pissy odds = about as good a chance of actually winning your bet as you are going to get with a system as rigged as the betting industry is!
Dermot (Timothy/Jack/Mark) whichever alias you choose to be, you're very good at writing bullshit I'll give you that. But what you're doing is wrong you're taking money off people who most likely can't afford to lose money and from what I can see you've been doing this for years and years dating back to at least 2010 when you registered Finessebet which eventually dissolved. Why don't you try working like everyone else instead of scamming people?
Customer support service by UserEcho
I would like to pitch in here and respond to Adam. He calls the system stupid and I fully understand where he is coming from as not long ago I would have responded in exactly the same way if someone had told me that there was serious money to be made by wagering non-trivial amounts in order to make piffling gains. So, I fully empathise Adam with why you feel the way you do! On the face of it it seems like an insane way to bet. However, I want you to reflect soberly upon the following facts; the denizens of the financial mile in the City of London consider that they have had a good day if at the end of it their overall portfolio value has increased by just a piddling 3%. Because of the miracle of compounding interest if an investment account is increasing in value at just that rate it takes less than a month to double your start-up bank! Were you aware of this? If you don't believe me then do the maths yourself and you will find that you can actually double your account balance in less than a month. It sounds hard to believe but if you do the arithmetic you'll find that I speak sooth.
(Einstein called Compounding Interest the 8th natural marvel of the world.)
Now let me diverge a little bit to tell you a story. Several months ago I started using a horse racing system that was touted as having a strike rate very comparable to that of AutoRiskEliminator. I put in my due diligence and researched as much as I could before parting with my money and the testimonials were enthusiastic and quite supportive of the system so I bought it. They recommended putting 15% of your total available bank on each bet. In just three weeks I parlayed my start-up Betfair bank of about £200 into twenty pounds short of £400 - which was my initial target. 3 weeks! I was quietly ecstatic!
Then,
I had a loser. And within a week I had another three losers which dropped me all the way back to virtually what I had started with. To say I was disappointed is an understatement of magnitude - I was really crushed. I was so close to realising a long-standing dream of mine to find some way to reliably parlay x amount of money into 2x and then 4x and so on. And then to see your dream stamped on - man it hurts. Needless to say I stopped using that particular system pronto.
To this day I don't really understand why a system that had performed so well for three whole weeks just suddenly went bad on me. Statistics and probabilities I suppose but I'm no mathematician so can't say for sure. Horse racing is a game
with a hell of a lot of variables to be factored into it so maybe Sod's Law just came up!
Anyway to get back to the main gist. It seems to me that football offers far fewer variables than the gee-gee game does so
maybe 1x really can be parlayed into 2x, 4x, 8x etc.! Time - and practice of the system - will tell.
Be aware that money aggregates so fast with a compounding interest system that you can take an occasional loser in your
stride but runs of losers really do dent you. Also be aware that while you are aggregating that your daily 'interest' gain in
your account is analogous to the City of London traders having a good day! Worth thinking about! Also remember that odds of 1.01 to 1.1 are typical of what bookies offer when you're trying to bet on Roger or Rafa winning a tennis match. That's when they're opposed by a rank and file player who they're definitely expected to beat quite easily; you only get decent odds with these players when they're playing someone else in the top twenty. So, decent odds = good chance of losing your bet, pissy odds = about as good a chance of actually winning your bet as you are going to get with a system as rigged as the betting industry is!